Not even in the cases of rape or incest.
Not even if the mother's life is in danger because a mother's life is never in danger that an abortion becomes an option.
There’s no such exception as life of the mother, and as far as health of the mother, same thing, with advances in science and technology. Health of the mother has become a tool for abortions any time, under any reason.See, that is as clear as it gets.
Why, you ask?
Because Santorum too has the same stance as Walsh, albeit with one exception. And by one exception, I mean one specific exemption. For his wife. Karen Santorum had a septic spontaneous abortion which is not an induced abortion, but technically one anyway. They were "certain" that unless she was given antibiotics she would die of the infection she had contracted, and it may cause
They did opt for the procedure, because Santorum called it a gunshot threat that would have rendered him a widower and their children motherless.
Wonder whether Santorum would flip-flop on his earlier hypocritical flip-flop if heard that assertion of Walsh's.
But these are righteous, bigoted hypocrites who know that the media will never hold them accountable. This is not a moral dilemma for Santorum at all. All he has to do is to cite someone like Todd Akin's wingnut doctor and claim that today there is never any danger to a mother's life because of medical advances, but back then there was; and then too only for Karen.
Yeah, the same Karen who before Ricky was in an unmarried relationship with an abortion doctor.